<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Caching Chronicles &#187; Squid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cachingchronicles.com/tag/squid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cachingchronicles.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:18:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Caching Performance: Squid vs. Varnish</title>
		<link>http://cachingchronicles.com/caching-performance-squid-vs-varnish/</link>
		<comments>http://cachingchronicles.com/caching-performance-squid-vs-varnish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varnish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holy War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cachingchronicles.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On deserialized.com there&#8217;s a nice pair (Part I &#038; Part II) of articles comparing Squid and Varnish.
While the findings there closely resemble the results of my own testing and live installations, they have to be taken with a grain of salt (as you should do with all test results anyway). The major thing here is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cachingchronicles.com/caching-performance-squid-vs-varnish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Squid 3.0 Stable 14 released</title>
		<link>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-30-stable-14-released/</link>
		<comments>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-30-stable-14-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cachingchronicles.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April, 11 2009 the Squid guys released version 3.0Stable14. Changes from the ChangeLog:


HTTP 1.1: Forward OPTIONS requests properly
 The debug mode option &#8216;-d&#8217; was not documented in LDAP helpers usage message
 Windows port: Added support for Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 and later
 Windows port: Fix PSAPI.DLL usage, is always available on Windows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-30-stable-14-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Squid 3.1.0.7 released</title>
		<link>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-3107-released/</link>
		<comments>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-3107-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caching in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cachingchronicles.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As can be seen in the download section of Squid-Cache.org, Squid 3.1.0.7 has been released. Changes are essentially the same as in 3.0Stable14:


Bug #2628: Need way to override DEFAULT_PID_FILE
Regression fix: test for .po properly.
HTTP 1.1: Forward OPTIONS requests properly
The debug mode option &#8216;-d&#8217; was not documented in LDAP helpers usage message
Purge last remnants of inet_ntoa
Windows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cachingchronicles.com/squid-3107-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to &#8220;The Caching Chronicles&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cachingchronicles.com/welcome-to-the-caching-chronicles/</link>
		<comments>http://cachingchronicles.com/welcome-to-the-caching-chronicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caching in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varnish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cachingchronicles.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is yet another site born in my search for a place where I can drop my thoughts, ideas and other stuff. This time it&#8217;s all about caching. In particular this means caching of content normally delivered by a web server to a requesting party.  Now, why caching? Isn&#8217;t that a technology we should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cachingchronicles.com/welcome-to-the-caching-chronicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
